X Tutup
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20250409025817/https://github.com/python/peps/pull/4346
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PEP 736: Mark as Rejected #4346

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

PEP 736: Mark as Rejected #4346

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

Gerardwx
Copy link

@Gerardwx Gerardwx commented Apr 4, 2025

Document SC rejection.

  • SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
  • Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
  • Resolution field points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g. `01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/t/12345/100>`__)
  • Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
  • Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4346.org.readthedocs.build/

@Gerardwx Gerardwx requested a review from Rosuav as a code owner April 4, 2025 16:46
@carljm

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Rosuav
Copy link
Contributor

Rosuav commented Apr 4, 2025

PEP 736 (/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/pep-previews/checkouts/4346/peps/pep-0736.rst): Rejected  is not a valid Status value

Is there possibly a space after the word Rejected?

Meta-note: Can (and should) the parser be made more permissive in this area?

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra changed the title Rejected by steering council PEP 736: Rejected by steering council Apr 4, 2025
@AA-Turner AA-Turner changed the title PEP 736: Rejected by steering council PEP 736: Mark as Rejected Apr 4, 2025
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments

Do the authors want to add a note summarising the rejection notice on Discourse?

A

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Possibly. Or Joshua may prefer to, not sure if he's seen this thread.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, there was a superfluous space.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
X Tutup