X Tutup
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20220912181142/https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/pull/16948
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore failure attempting to set console window title #16948

Merged
merged 10 commits into from Mar 30, 2022

Conversation

SteveL-MSFT
Copy link
Member

@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT commented Mar 2, 2022

PR Summary

Reported by a partner that they are using PowerShell console host in automation where there is no terminal window and SetConsoleWindowTitle call fails and the console host exits. Since this is a useful, but decorative feature, we should handle this gracefully by ignoring the Win32 API error and not attempt to set the window title subsequent times.

PR Checklist

Copy link
Contributor

@krishnayalavarthi krishnayalavarthi left a comment

Looks good to me

@SteveL-MSFT

This comment was marked as outdated.

@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT changed the title Ignore failure to console window title Ignore failure attempting to set console window title Mar 3, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@PaulHigin PaulHigin left a comment

Minor comment only.

Copy link
Collaborator

@iSazonov iSazonov left a comment

LGTM with one style comment.

@@ -2494,6 +2494,8 @@ internal static string GetConsoleWindowTitle()
return consoleTitle.ToString();
}

private static bool dontSetConsoleWindowTitle;
Copy link
Collaborator

@iSazonov iSazonov Mar 10, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Our style:

Suggested change
private static bool dontSetConsoleWindowTitle;
private static bool s_dontSetConsoleWindowTitle;

Copy link
Member Author

@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT Mar 10, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like the convention in the codebase is not an s_, but pascal casing instead of camel

Copy link
Member Author

@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT Mar 10, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

codefactor wants to start with lowercase, so changing back to lowercase but not updating rest of codebase.

Copy link
Collaborator

@iSazonov iSazonov Mar 11, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SteveL-MSFT Please look our guidelines we follow for years https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/blob/master/docs/dev-process/coding-guidelines.md#naming-conventions

Use camelCase to name internal and private fields and use readonly where possible. Prefix instance fields with , static fields with s and thread static fields with t. When used on static fields, readonly should come after static (i.e. static readonly not readonly static).

This says us to use s_dontSetConsoleWindowTitle

@pull-request-quantifier
Copy link

pull-request-quantifier bot commented Mar 10, 2022

This PR has 7 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +7 -0
Percentile : 2.8%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.cs : +7 -0

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detetcted.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  👌  👎 (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@msftbot msftbot bot added the Review - Needed The PR is being reviewed label Mar 18, 2022
@msftbot
Copy link

msftbot bot commented Mar 18, 2022

This pull request has been automatically marked as Review Needed because it has been there has not been any activity for 7 days.
Maintainer, please provide feedback and/or mark it as Waiting on Author

@iSazonov iSazonov merged commit 788ffde into PowerShell:master Mar 30, 2022
46 checks passed
@msftbot msftbot bot removed the Review - Needed The PR is being reviewed label Mar 30, 2022
@iSazonov iSazonov added the CL-General Indicates that a PR should be marked as a general cmdlet change in the Change Log label Mar 30, 2022
@SteveL-MSFT SteveL-MSFT deleted the setwindowtitle branch Mar 30, 2022
@msftbot
Copy link

msftbot bot commented May 23, 2022

🎉v7.3.0-preview.4 has been released which incorporates this pull request.🎉

Handy links:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CL-General Indicates that a PR should be marked as a general cmdlet change in the Change Log Extra Small
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants
X Tutup