New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpo-433030: Add support of atomic grouping in regular expressions #31982
Merged
serhiy-storchaka
merged 9 commits into
python:main
from
serhiy-storchaka:re-atomic-groups
Mar 21, 2022
+593
−92
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a4f8ac0
bpo-433030: Add support of atomic grouping in regular expressions
serhiy-storchaka 5066bd1
Polishing.
serhiy-storchaka 8015968
Update documentation.
serhiy-storchaka 599109c
Fix incorrect use of the term role.
serhiy-storchaka 711975d
Polishing.
serhiy-storchaka 1ff76c3
Merge branch 'main' into re-atomic-groups
serhiy-storchaka 9d54059
Simplify the compliler code.
serhiy-storchaka 7e4f64a
Fix possesive repetition of 1-character pattern
serhiy-storchaka b9e20f0
Add the original author in Misc/ACKS.
serhiy-storchaka File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.


There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could use a three-state flag (capturing/non-capturing/atomic) instead of two boolean flags. It could even be a tiny bit faster if use built-in singletons True/False/None. But the current code may be clearer.