X Tutup
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20220627182236/https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/94345
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dataclasses astuple and asdict crash on recursive dataclass structures #94345

Open
zzzeek opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

dataclasses astuple and asdict crash on recursive dataclass structures #94345

zzzeek opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
type-bug

Comments

@zzzeek
Copy link

@zzzeek zzzeek commented Jun 27, 2022

I don't see this mentioned anywhere and it seems a bit unusual, we can't use asdict() or astuple() with dataclasses that have cycles to each other. This is something that is handled by most other stdlib features such as deepcopy, dataclasses stringify, etc.

Example below

from __future__ import annotations

import dataclasses

# dataclasses support recursive structures

@dataclasses.dataclass
class A:
    b: list[B] = dataclasses.field(default_factory=list)

@dataclasses.dataclass
class B:
    a: A

# we can make a recursive structure
a1 = A()
b1 = B(a1)
a1.b.append(b1)

# stringify supports recursion
print(a1)
print(b1)


# asdict and astuple don't however, with no way to even work around
# it (like pass in a set to track already seen objects)

# recursion overflow
dataclasses.asdict(a1)

# same
dataclasses.astuple(a1)

output:

A(b=[B(a=...)])
B(a=A(b=[...]))
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/classic/dev/sqlalchemy/test4.py", line 29, in <module>
    dataclasses.asdict(a1)
  File "/opt/python-3.10.0/lib/python3.10/dataclasses.py", line 1232, in asdict
    return _asdict_inner(obj, dict_factory)
  File "/opt/python-3.10.0/lib/python3.10/dataclasses.py", line 1239, in _asdict_inner
    value = _asdict_inner(getattr(obj, f.name), dict_factory)
  File "/opt/python-3.10.0/lib/python3.10/dataclasses.py", line 1267, in _asdict_inner
    return type(obj)(_asdict_inner(v, dict_factory) for v in obj)
  File "/opt/python-3.10.0/lib/python3.10/dataclasses.py", line 1267, in <genexpr>
    return type(obj)(_asdict_inner(v, dict_factory) for v in obj)
  File "/opt/python-3.10.0/lib/python3.10/dataclasses.py", line 1239, in _asdict_inner
    value = _asdict_inner(getattr(obj, f.name), dict_factory)
  File "/opt/python-3.10.0/lib/python3.10/dataclasses.py", line 1239, in _asdict_inner

...

  File "/opt/python-3.10.0/lib/python3.10/dataclasses.py", line 1236, in _asdict_inner
    if _is_dataclass_instance(obj):
  File "/opt/python-3.10.0/lib/python3.10/dataclasses.py", line 1201, in _is_dataclass_instance
    return hasattr(type(obj), _FIELDS)
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object

there seems to be no workaround as these two methods are pretty simple and don't accept any arguments like "check_recursion", IIUC there is also no directive on field() that would change this either?

@zzzeek zzzeek added the type-bug label Jun 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant
X Tutup