New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make sure we execute tests on LTS package for older LTS releases #17326
Conversation
|
This PR has Quantification details
Why proper sizing of changes matters
Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
What can I do to optimize my changes
How to interpret the change counts in git diff output
Was this comment helpful? |
|
Handy links: |
|
/backport to release/v7.0.12 |
|
/backport to release/v7.2.5 |
|
Started backporting to release/v7.0.12: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/actions/runs/2380482054
|
|
Started backporting to release/v7.2.5: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/actions/runs/2380482554
|
|
Handy links: |


PR Summary
Using the LTS.Package value is more accurate so that we execute LTS package tests in release automation for 7.0.x and 7.2.x.
PR Context
The new LTS.Package denoted that this release is packaged as LTS and hence we should use this value instead of LTS.Latest.
PR Checklist
.h,.cpp,.cs,.ps1and.psm1files have the correct copyright headerWIP:or[ WIP ]to the beginning of the title (theWIPbot will keep its status check atPendingwhile the prefix is present) and remove the prefix when the PR is ready.(which runs in a different PS Host).