X Tutup
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20221223134515/https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/83720
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve Keccak support in hashlib including KangarooTwelve #83720

Open
gvanas mannequin opened this issue Feb 3, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Improve Keccak support in hashlib including KangarooTwelve #83720

gvanas mannequin opened this issue Feb 3, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
stdlib Python modules in the Lib dir type-feature A feature request or enhancement

Comments

@gvanas
Copy link
Mannequin

gvanas mannequin commented Feb 3, 2020

BPO 39539
Nosy @gpshead, @tiran, @Mariatta, @gvanas

Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2020-02-03.10:25:05.173>
labels = ['type-feature', 'library', '3.9']
title = 'Improve Keccak support in hashlib including KangarooTwelve'
updated_at = <Date 2020-02-04.01:00:29.148>
user = 'https://github.com/gvanas'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2020-02-04.01:00:29.148>
actor = 'gregory.p.smith'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2020-02-03.10:25:05.173>
creator = 'gvanas'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 39539
keywords = []
message_count = 3.0
messages = ['361280', '361331', '361333']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['gregory.p.smith', 'christian.heimes', 'Mariatta', 'gvanas']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = 'needs patch'
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue39539'
versions = ['Python 3.9']
@gvanas
Copy link
Mannequin Author

gvanas mannequin commented Feb 3, 2020

Dear all,

I think it would be nice if hashlib would include the support of Keccak with a chosen suffix, as well as the fast instance KangarooTwelve (K12).

  1. Currently, hashlib's interface for Keccak only supports the 6 instances of FIPS 202 (SHA3-* and SHAKE*). However, the instances in NIST SP 800-185 (cSHAKE, KMAC, …) use a different suffix and therefore cannot be instantiated on top of the aforementioned 6 instances. Instead, simply adding the suffix as an argument to the constructor would enable a user to instantiate plain Keccak (as in Ethereum) or the SP 800-185 instances.

  2. K12 is an alternative hash function (and XOF) in the Keccak family. It is fast, parallelizable and it benefits directly from the cryptanalysis on the (unchanged) underlying permutation since 2008. This would be IMHO a valuable addition to hashlib. Among others, implementations of K12 can be found in the XKCP on GitHub.

Kind regards,
Gilles (co-designer of Keccak and K12)

@gvanas gvanas mannequin added 3.9 stdlib Python modules in the Lib dir type-feature A feature request or enhancement labels Feb 3, 2020
@Mariatta
Copy link
Sponsor Member

Mariatta commented Feb 4, 2020

Added hashlib module experts.

@gpshead
Copy link
Member

gpshead commented Feb 4, 2020

Christian added the SHA3 support so is probably best to comment on this. The way our hashlib code is structured we always use the https://github.com/python/cpython/tree/master/Modules/_sha3 implementation rather than OpenSSL for these algorithms due to the better functionality of that Keccak code. So at first glance it should be reasonably straightforward to update it to accept an optional suffix constructor argument.

PR welcome.

@ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 10, 2022
@kigawas kigawas mentioned this issue Jul 27, 2022
Closed
@gpshead
Copy link
Member

gpshead commented Nov 7, 2022

We've simplified our sha3 fallback code when OpenSSL doesn't provide it to be tiny_sha3 in #91254.

Supporting things outside of the very standardized hashes realm is better left to PyPI packages. See also our BLAKE3 stdlib rejection #83479 (comment).

But your point 1 mentions the https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-185/final sha3 keccak variant hashes. Are these widely used by any system that is not a cryptocurrency? In any standard protocols? If so, they may be worth considering for hashlib.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
stdlib Python modules in the Lib dir type-feature A feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@gpshead @Mariatta @erlend-aasland
X Tutup