While I'm skeptical about the legitimacy of the take-down, I had to down-vote because you did not provide an argument for your position.

While I'm skeptical about the legitimacy of the take-down, I had to down-vote because you did not provide an argument for your position.

Here's your argument:

I've investigated this report and found it was in bad faith. The code itself did not break any laws. People abusing YouTube's faulty system is not at the fault of the people.

Why are you not taking down browsers, who are able to play videos just fine? Why are you not taking down screen recording software that's perfectly capable of just recording it? This is a targeted attack.

Fair use was not taken into account. Instead of pressuring YouTube to fix their system, you're playing a game of cat and mouse you'll never win.

I understand my words will fall silent here, and I will absolutely not fight to hold this position, but here is the argument you so desperately wanted.