X Tutup

COLLECTED BY

Organization: Archive Team

Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.

History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.

The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.

This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.

Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.

The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.

Collection: Archive Team: The Github Hitrub

This collection is a set of Github repository archives from two major sets: A panic grab upon the acquisition by Microsoft, and a larger, ongoing set of Pretty Much Everything.

TIMESTAMPS

The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20201215130646/https://github.com/python/devguide/pull/587

python / devguide

Sponsor

Sponsor python/devguide
Watch 119
Star 897
Fork 381

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix good commit example to use imperative title #587

Merged

aeros merged 5 commits into python:master from DahlitzFlorian:fix-issue-577

May 25, 2020

Contributor

DahlitzFlorian commented May 21, 2020

Closes: #577

Fix good commit example to use imperative title
Explicitly mention the preference for imperative over descriptive titles
Link to the article from Chris Beams

@gvanrossum I added the link to the article as suggested by you. The Git Bootcamp is mentioning the article, too, but I agree with you that it is better to explicitly mention it at this point, too.

DahlitzFlorian added 2 commits


          Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'

8b5876f


          Fix good commit example to use imperative title

e6432e1

- Fix example to use imperative title
- Explicitly mention the preference for imperative over descriptive titles
- Link to the article from Chris Beams

the-knights-who-say-ni added the CLA signed label

gvanrossum requested a review from aeros

aeros reviewed

Member

aeros left a comment •

edited

Thanks for the PR @DahlitzFlorian. It mostly LGTM; I just have a very minor suggestion.

Since this issue is very well defined and straightforward, I'm good w/ merging it after the suggested changes are made.

pullrequest.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved


          Apply suggestions from code review @aeros

a2a902e

Contributor Author

DahlitzFlorian commented May 22, 2020

Thanks for the fast feedback @aeros! I applied your suggestion.

terryjreedy requested changes

Member

terryjreedy left a comment

Approve other than one case issue.

pullrequest.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved


          Apply suggestion made by @terryjreedy

7d16a28

Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>

DahlitzFlorian requested review from terryjreedy and aeros

Member

terryjreedy commented May 24, 2020

LGTM. Kyle, leaving this for you if you get to it.

aeros reviewed

pullrequest.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved


          Apply changes suggested by @aeros

2be1ce9

Co-authored-by: Kyle Stanley <aeros167@gmail.com>

aeros approved these changes

Member

aeros left a comment

With the latest changes, LGTM. Thanks for working on this @DahlitzFlorian.

aeros merged commit 74d5f3a into python:master

2 checks passed

2 checks passed

continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed

Details

docs/readthedocs.org:cpython-devguide Read the Docs build succeeded!

Details

DahlitzFlorian deleted the DahlitzFlorian:fix-issue-577 branch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

You can’t perform that action at this time.

X Tutup