/preview

Please find a preview at: https://staging.nodejs.dev/749/

Can we keep this open ? I think we need to discuss the design changes in the meeting tomorrow

Can a line icon be used for the third one (Mentioning Packaging) for consistency ?

/preview

Please find a preview at: https://staging.nodejs.dev/749/

Use inverse green on dark mode – I'll provide new assets so we don't have to worry about licensing 👍

@amiller-gh Do you have the new assets for the icons?

@ahmadawais please update your PR, we are approving this PR and when we have the new svg files, we will create an issue to update later.

Can you confirm the license of this icons are free to be used?

This is the licensing of the free icon8 icons
used in this PR. I believe we can find icons with more relaxed licensing than this like @amiller-gh said he will. Feel fee to replace them here. 💯

https://icons8.com/license

Am I missing something on that page? It's the same page you linked previously and I don't see anything on it that substantiates the assertion that we can use them. Specifically, this section that's titled "open-source" doesn't really clearly define that we can or cannot use them to me, though I could be wrong:

Established open source projects could get the icons for free. For you, we'll opensource the resources that you need.

By established projects we mean the Wikipedia criteria. If you have a page on Wikipedia and it's not removed for a week, you're qualified.

If you're specifically referring to the free plan, it states this:

Limited for mats in lower resolution. Please link to Icons8 on each page where you use our assets.

I do not see any link back to Icons8 in this PR, which is a polite requirement of the free plan. If I am correct in this, it's concerning that the PR made it this far in scrutiny without realizing that.

Frankly would prefer to avoid linking to external resources like this on the homepage even if the cost of that is not using the resources. Our platform is disproportionately large and I'd strongly play favorites on individual pages (though I do think having a full dependencies page would be beneficial).

ping @amiller-gh Can we get the updated assets?
If not @kodekage would you mind updating your icons to svg.

As @bnb has stated we should just use low resolution svg's and once we have the right assets we can change them, but lets get this issue approved and closed

@designMoreWeb that is categorically not what I said.

@designMoreWeb that is categorically not what I said.

Tierney, sorry i misunderstood. Could you please clarify what the block is meant to be as i am trying to push and drive this forward

@designMoreWeb the block quote is a quote from the free licenses page. The current changes don't meet those requirements and, as I stated, I would prefer if we did not go down the path of meeting those.

It would be nice to get clarification/an explicit +1 from them if we meet their guidelines for Open-Source. It would be preferable to have no ambiguity here.

@bnb I found different MIT licensed icons from HeroIcons. If these look good I can update the PR.

Or here's an alternate via SimpleIcons which are Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal licensed.

@ahmadawais I think the JS and Open Source logos make sense for JavaScript and Open Source, respectively. Any possibility of using a globe icon for "Everywhere"? Looks like HeroIcons has a globe and whatever the one you used for JavaScript is 👍

That's also what I think but the SimpleIcons has no globe logo. Let me see what we can do.

/preview

Please find a preview at: https://staging.nodejs.dev/749/

Looks great only thing on mobile they look very big in size

Might need slight resizing but otherwise it's good