Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upExpand scope of formatting to enforce formatting on more files #36940
Conversation
d3152b0
to
f10ab5a
f10ab5a
to
691e8c2
|
Reviewed-for: fw-i18n The commit message scope should be |
Historically files to be formatted were added to a listing (via matchers) to be included in formatting. Instead, this change begins efforts to instead include all files in format enforcement, relying instead on an opt out methodology.
Historically files to be formatted were added to a listing (via matchers) to be included in formatting. Instead, this change begins efforts to instead include all files in format enforcement, relying instead on an opt out methodology.
Historically files to be formatted were added to a listing (via matchers) to be included in formatting. Instead, this change begins efforts to instead include all files in format enforcement, relying instead on an opt out methodology.
691e8c2
to
2b9624f
|
LGTM. @josephperrott I'm assuming we can rely on the extract-cldr script outputting properly formatted files? I see it runs clang-format, so whenever we should re-generate the data, there should be no formatting changes? |
|
@devversion Correct, when we recreate the CLDR data it will be created correctly as we run the same formatter over it as we do for our enforcement. |
|
We should give a heads-up ping to everyone before merging this. Review-for: fw-core |
|
@atscott Happy to announce, though it looks like this will not effect much outstanding work:
|
Oh, that's cool. Didn't know we had that! One thing I just thought of: could you update the required base sha so that we ensure PRs are formatted correctly? |
|
@atscott will do in a follow up PR once we have the SHAs available from this PR merging. |
Historically files to be formatted were added to a listing (via matchers) to be included in formatting. Instead, this change begins efforts to instead include all files in format enforcement, relying instead on an opt out methodology. PR Close angular#36940
Historically files to be formatted were added to a listing (via matchers) to be included in formatting. Instead, this change begins efforts to instead include all files in format enforcement, relying instead on an opt out methodology. PR Close angular#36940
Historically files to be formatted were added to a listing (via matchers) to be included in formatting. Instead, this change begins efforts to instead include all files in format enforcement, relying instead on an opt out methodology. PR Close angular#36940


josephperrott commentedMay 5, 2020
See individual commits.
All
js/tschanges in this change are the result ofclang-formatenforcing format on the code.