Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Export PSReadLine to changes to public project #996
Comments
andschwa
added this to the v0.5.0 milestone
May 18, 2016
andschwa
self-assigned this
May 18, 2016
andschwa
modified the milestones:
v0.5.0,
v0.6.0
Jun 8, 2016
andschwa
added
the
Area-PSReadLine
label
Jun 9, 2016
andschwa
added
in progress
Blocked
labels
Jun 21, 2016
|
While extracting the history and making PSReadLine build stand-alone against the public reference assemblies, I got blocked by a weird .NET possible bug. Filed dotnet/corefx#9658. |
andschwa
modified the milestones:
Aug17,
v0.6.0,
Future
Jun 29, 2016
joeyaiello
added
the
Issue-Enhancement
label
Sep 2, 2016
andschwa
referenced this issue
in lzybkr/PSReadLine
Sep 16, 2016
Closed
Import PowerShell changes #442
|
Changes have been exported, closing. |
andschwa
closed this
Sep 19, 2016
lzybkr
reopened this
Sep 19, 2016
|
This shouldn't be closed until PSReadline has a single source of truth.
|
|
Okay, well I'm at least changing over the assignee then. |
andschwa
assigned
lzybkr
and unassigned
andschwa
Sep 19, 2016
HemantMahawar
modified the milestones:
6.0.0,
post-6.0.0
Oct 17, 2016
SteveL-MSFT
removed
the
3 - Working
label
Nov 12, 2016
joeyaiello
modified the milestones:
6.1.0,
6.0.0
May 22, 2017
added a commit
to lzybkr/PowerShell
that referenced
this issue
Dec 29, 2017
lzybkr
removed
the
Blocked
label
Dec 29, 2017
added a commit
to lzybkr/PowerShell
that referenced
this issue
Dec 29, 2017
added a commit
to lzybkr/PowerShell
that referenced
this issue
Jan 8, 2018
added a commit
to lzybkr/PowerShell
that referenced
this issue
Jan 8, 2018
TravisEz13
closed this
in
#5759
Jan 20, 2018
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 20, 2018
|
After this change, the easiest way to pull the Pester module from PowerShell Gallery is to add it to the file
Another option - probably a more accurate - is to create the new one csproj file - by analogy to In both options the functions
What do you think? Am I right? My comment is related to #4618. |
|
@it-praktyk - Furthermore, at least in AppVeyor (I'm not sure about Travis) - the cache is saved across builds, so we shouldn't see too many pulls from CI. I think what I did for |


andschwa commentedMay 18, 2016
This is just so I remember to do this for @lzybkr.