X Tutup
Skip to content

bpo-39562: Allow executing asynchronous comprehensions in the asyncio REPL#18968

Merged
pablogsal merged 5 commits intopython:masterfrom
isidentical:bpo-39562
Mar 19, 2020
Merged

bpo-39562: Allow executing asynchronous comprehensions in the asyncio REPL#18968
pablogsal merged 5 commits intopython:masterfrom
isidentical:bpo-39562

Conversation

@isidentical
Copy link
Member

@isidentical isidentical commented Mar 12, 2020 •
edited by pablogsal
Loading

https://bugs.python.org/issue39562

Allow executing asynchronous comprehensions on the top level when the
PyCF_ALLOW_TOP_LEVEL_AWAIT flag is given.

@Jackenmen
Copy link
Contributor

Jackenmen commented Mar 12, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Does this also fix the async comprehension with await that was mentioned in the issue?
e.g.

[await asyncio.sleep(1, x) for x in range(5)]

I just noticed there's no test added for that and I don't know if these two cases differ under the hood.

@isidentical
Copy link
Member Author

isidentical commented Mar 12, 2020

Yes, it is! Will add a test.

>>> import asyncio
>>> [await asyncio.sleep(1, x) for x in range(5)]
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]

@Jackenmen
Copy link
Contributor

Jackenmen commented Mar 12, 2020

Thanks for checking that :)

@isidentical isidentical requested review from 1st1 and pablogsal March 12, 2020 19:50
@isidentical
Copy link
Member Author

isidentical commented Mar 12, 2020

I'm not sure if this is an enhancement or a bugfix so should we backports this to the 3.8? @1st1 @pablogsal

@pablogsal
Copy link
Member

pablogsal commented Mar 12, 2020

I think is a bug, this should be allowed the same way regular for loops are allowed so we need to backport this.

pablogsal
pablogsal reviewed Mar 12, 2020
View reviewed changes
pablogsal
pablogsal reviewed Mar 12, 2020
View reviewed changes
@isidentical isidentical requested a review from pablogsal March 13, 2020 08:51
@pablogsal pablogsal changed the title bpo-39562: Run asynchronous comprehensions under asyncio repl bpo-39562: Allow executing asynchronous comprehensions in the asyncio REPL Mar 15, 2020
@pablogsal pablogsal self-assigned this Mar 15, 2020
@pablogsal pablogsal merged commit 9052f7a into python:master Mar 19, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

miss-islington commented Mar 19, 2020

Thanks @isidentical for the PR, and @pablogsal for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2020
@isidentical @miss-islington
bpo-39562: Allow executing asynchronous comprehensions in the asyncio…
80a0928 
… REPL (pythonGH-18968)

Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo <Pablogsal@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9052f7a)

Co-authored-by: Batuhan Taşkaya <47358913+isidentical@users.noreply.github.com>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

bedevere-bot commented Mar 19, 2020

GH-19070 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2020
@miss-islington @isidentical
bpo-39562: Allow executing asynchronous comprehensions in the asyncio…
ec8a973 
… REPL (GH-18968)

Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo <Pablogsal@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9052f7a)

Co-authored-by: Batuhan Taşkaya <47358913+isidentical@users.noreply.github.com>
Carreau
Carreau reviewed Jul 6, 2020
View reviewed changes
Python/compile.c

outermost = (comprehension_ty) asdl_seq_GET(generators, 0);
if (IS_TOP_LEVEL_AWAIT(c)) {
c->u->u_ste->ste_coroutine = 1;
Copy link
Contributor

@Carreau Carreau Jul 6, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this was over aggressive, it marks even non-async list comprehensions as coroutine, which breaks IPython/Jupyter. It should be marked as ste_coroutine only if await is somewhere.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@pablogsal pablogsal pablogsal approved these changes

@1st1 1st1 Awaiting requested review from 1st1

+1 more reviewer

@Carreau Carreau Carreau left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@pablogsal pablogsal

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@isidentical @Jackenmen @pablogsal @miss-islington @bedevere-bot @Carreau @the-knights-who-say-ni
X Tutup