Tools using AI are increasingly used to produce text and code, but verifying the quality of such output can be difficult. We ask you, the contributor(s), to be willing to adapt your workflow accordingly. The guidelines also apply, or have a direct counterpart, with entirely human-produced content.

1. We strive to evaluate contributions based on their merit, not their authors.

2. We ask that you have either written, or read and reviewed yourself, every part of your contribution. You are responsible for its quality. It is strongly recommended that you review a proposed contribution in full even if you wrote all of it.

3. If a significant portion of your code, PR description, review comments or messages has been AI-generated, this must be disclosed, stating which tool was used and for what. Reviewing AI-produced code can require a different approach from human-written code. You should have an acknowledgement anyway even if another human contributor did some of the work.

4. Please be mindful that reviewer time is a scarce resource. Contributions (whether human- or AI-authored) should strive to conserve it.

5. When you submit code, however it was written, you take responsibility for its provenance. You will need to sign the OCaml contributor licence agreement (CLA) for any significant contribution.

6. The following are never acceptable as contributions: low-effort productions of code that contributors do not understand; plagiarised works; hallucinated security reports; or experiments involving humans without their advance consent.