Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
Nice find, anchoring to the start with |
| parsed_url = function(t) | ||
| local uri = ngx.var.request_uri | ||
| uri = uri:match("(.-)%?") or uri | ||
| local pos = uri:find("?") |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't find("?", 1, true) be even faster?
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
also those two lines could be turned into something like `local uri = uri:sub(1, (uri:find("?", 1, true) or 0) -1)
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
probably an insignificant amount, there is no pattern on the single character pattern, so it will still end up matching it literally. Regarding combining the two lines, I don't really see an advantage to making it harder to read
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Corrected fix for #490